The Insider Essay Research Paper The movie free essay sample

The Insider Essay, Research Paper The film, The Insider, is about Jeffrey Wigand, a former baccy executive of one of the largest baccy companies in America. He is fired from his occupation, and is shortly contacted by Lowell Bergman, the manufacturer of 60 proceedingss. Bergman, played by Al Pacino, asks Wigand, played by Russell Crowe, to do sense of some documents about fire statistics, which belong to, baccy company, Wilson Phillips These documents cryptically show up on his doorsill. Wigand lets it drop that he has some inside information about Big Tobacco, a group of the seven biggest baccy companies. The information pertains to a chemical put into coffin nails that the CEOs of the seven midgets are cognizant are habit-forming. Large Tobacco has neer lost a personal hurts instance because their defence until so has been that they aren t certain if coffin nails are habit-forming. Bergman convinces Wigand to state his obliging narrative, and let it to be circulated throughout the media, by stating Wigand that it i s for the good of the state. We will write a custom essay sample on The Insider Essay Research Paper The movie or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Bergman and Wigand turn a bond throughout the film, but are showered by letdown when all the different types of media garbage to aerate the narrative because of the effects that come along with it. Finally, they get the narrative into the newspapers. Based on a true narrative, The Insider s Bergman and Wigand put their lives, callings, reputes, and household at hazard by standing up against Big Tobacco. In this film, it was evident that the bottom-line was of import when make up ones minding on whether or non to aerate the narrative. But you can t regulation out the headline. After all, the headline effected the bottom-line vastly. It was because the headline was so unsafe, and controversial that the managers of the web decided they wouldn t allow the narrative to be aired. They would hold been sued, and would hold lost their repute as a respectable show, because one of Big Tobacco s defence has been to out pass their resistance. The money that would hold been spent on tribunal inst ances effects the web s bottom-line. In The Insider the ultimate power of determination appeared to lie, non in the custodies of the manufacturer, but in the custodies of the web the show aired on. When the section that trades with legal actions told the business department of the effects the story will have, and how the story wasn t worth the consequences, the network demanded that Bergman not air the story. Censorship plays a large part in the story. In the movie, Wigand is put through a rehearsal before the actual show. The most important parts of his confession are censored. He wasn t told about the changes until after the show is aired. Legally, the network didn t have to tell him, but by giving out a small portion of his story, he was subjected to ridicule because the show didn t give any of his evidence. He seemed unsupported with his accusations. Overall, I felt the film was a fair and balanced representation of how things work, at least in this situation. On the DVD version of The Insider the real Jeffrey Wigand and Lowell Bergman are interviewed. In their interview they say that the film is an amazing representation of what they lived through, and that not only was it accurate, but incredibly made, as well. I don t believe this way of doing business will ever change. Why would it? The big companies will always have the power, if not legally, than forcefully. Throughout the movie, Wigand and his family are subjected to the fear of finding bullets in their mailboxes, and threatening notes on their computers, and the worst of all, people, with guns, walking on their property at night. The smaller people in the world have to fight a hard and nasty fight to compete. Also, companies have so much more money than individuals. One person alone could not take on a major tobacco company, and six others who are supporting your opposition. There is no chance of a win. Also, in terms of the media s part in this story, the network s directors are the ones who decide what is aired on their channel. They would not put their lives, along with everyone else who works for the network, on the line for a major story. As major as a headline is, it effects the bottom-line, which is too importan t to overlook. There is nothing one can do about it. There are many businessmen in the world and none of them are going to put a good story ahead of their paychecks. At best, they ll sell the story to someone who is willing to take the risk.